<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Startups Stand a Chance on the Open Web?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/05/26/do-startups-stand-a-chance-on-the-open-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/05/26/do-startups-stand-a-chance-on-the-open-web/</link>
	<description>All conjecture, minimal substance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Guppy</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/05/26/do-startups-stand-a-chance-on-the-open-web/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Guppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=66#comment-154</guid>
		<description>If the mega players are threaten by Google, don&#039;t you think that smaller players will be crushed ? Accidentally or otherwise. Who can fight with FREE (they used to use it against Microsoft) but what is good for the goose is also good for the gander. Everyone suffers.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_22/b4086085715448.htm
Google Stifles Innovation. All this largesse might be understandable if Google weren&#039;t so nefariously bent on snuffing out progress. As Google hoards 70% of the lucrative U.S. search market, the company is using its heft and excess cash to promote free for free&#039;s sake—a nihilist m.o. if there ever was one. We&#039;re all the worse for it.

$0.02</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the mega players are threaten by Google, don&#8217;t you think that smaller players will be crushed ? Accidentally or otherwise. Who can fight with FREE (they used to use it against Microsoft) but what is good for the goose is also good for the gander. Everyone suffers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_22/b4086085715448.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_22/b4086085715448.htm</a><br />
Google Stifles Innovation. All this largesse might be understandable if Google weren&#8217;t so nefariously bent on snuffing out progress. As Google hoards 70% of the lucrative U.S. search market, the company is using its heft and excess cash to promote free for free&#8217;s sake—a nihilist m.o. if there ever was one. We&#8217;re all the worse for it.</p>
<p>$0.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Guppy</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/05/26/do-startups-stand-a-chance-on-the-open-web/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Guppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=66#comment-153</guid>
		<description>redherring too...

Red Herring evicted, looking for new home
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9949094-7.html

Friendster would need to radically revamp their system to beat facebook. But with Google, they may stand a chance...

If you notice Google has a lot of products/services but the rate of functional releases per product is rather slow compared to other Web 2.0 companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>redherring too&#8230;</p>
<p>Red Herring evicted, looking for new home<br />
<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9949094-7.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9949094-7.html</a></p>
<p>Friendster would need to radically revamp their system to beat facebook. But with Google, they may stand a chance&#8230;</p>
<p>If you notice Google has a lot of products/services but the rate of functional releases per product is rather slow compared to other Web 2.0 companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/05/26/do-startups-stand-a-chance-on-the-open-web/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 14:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=66#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree... remember FuckedCompany.com? :)


But seriously, I respect the fact that a lot of startup founders are also idealists - they want to create something that makes a difference and see it grow to the end.

It will take a lot of convincing (and a lot of money) to get them to sell. And that&#039;s how startups miss their exit windows.

I always wondered what would the social networking scene be like today if Friendster sold out to Google for $30 million in 2003. Would Facebook still be top dog today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree&#8230; remember FuckedCompany.com? <img src='http://armchairtheorist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But seriously, I respect the fact that a lot of startup founders are also idealists &#8211; they want to create something that makes a difference and see it grow to the end.</p>
<p>It will take a lot of convincing (and a lot of money) to get them to sell. And that&#8217;s how startups miss their exit windows.</p>
<p>I always wondered what would the social networking scene be like today if Friendster sold out to Google for $30 million in 2003. Would Facebook still be top dog today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Guppy</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/05/26/do-startups-stand-a-chance-on-the-open-web/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Guppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=66#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... If the Old Media with loads of old cash is afraid of Google, then new startups should not wait too long to sell themselves or get a sugar daddy to stand behind them with a Heavy Machine Gun.

Basically grab the cash and start a new idea. Wait any longer beyond the critical mass or peak of everyone&#039;s attention, the startup will be crushed ! The dotCom days are littered with dead companies.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-9946149-60.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; If the Old Media with loads of old cash is afraid of Google, then new startups should not wait too long to sell themselves or get a sugar daddy to stand behind them with a Heavy Machine Gun.</p>
<p>Basically grab the cash and start a new idea. Wait any longer beyond the critical mass or peak of everyone&#8217;s attention, the startup will be crushed ! The dotCom days are littered with dead companies.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-9946149-60.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-9946149-60.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kong</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/05/26/do-startups-stand-a-chance-on-the-open-web/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 04:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=66#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the follow-up Jon.

True, all the more it is for startups to engage, listen and provide timely answers to it&#039;s community. Open to communication. Launching a new service is only the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the follow-up Jon.</p>
<p>True, all the more it is for startups to engage, listen and provide timely answers to it&#8217;s community. Open to communication. Launching a new service is only the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/05/26/do-startups-stand-a-chance-on-the-open-web/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 04:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=66#comment-149</guid>
		<description>I believe Twitter has already bypassed the niche startup category and entered the lower end of the &quot;alphadog&quot; category of startups like Facebook did a couple years ago.

You know Twitter is at the &quot;alphadog&quot; level when, a) almost everyone you care about following online is using their service, and b) a cottage industry of services and applications sprung up around Twitter (Twhirl, TweetScan, TwitterFeed, etc.)

I guess when a startup is at that level, it can withstand an outage or two, provided that it shows that it is upfront with the community and that they are sincere about solving the problems. And to Twitter&#039;s credit, that&#039;s exactly what they are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Twitter has already bypassed the niche startup category and entered the lower end of the &#8220;alphadog&#8221; category of startups like Facebook did a couple years ago.</p>
<p>You know Twitter is at the &#8220;alphadog&#8221; level when, a) almost everyone you care about following online is using their service, and b) a cottage industry of services and applications sprung up around Twitter (Twhirl, TweetScan, TwitterFeed, etc.)</p>
<p>I guess when a startup is at that level, it can withstand an outage or two, provided that it shows that it is upfront with the community and that they are sincere about solving the problems. And to Twitter&#8217;s credit, that&#8217;s exactly what they are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kong</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/05/26/do-startups-stand-a-chance-on-the-open-web/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=66#comment-148</guid>
		<description>So agreed with you on the innovation and quality aspects. The innovation will kicks off the curiosity and sign-ups while the quality will help to create a stable and loyal user base.

However, Twitter defies the quality aspect. It&#039;s not the most stable web services out there with many outages recently but that hasn&#039;t turn many of it&#039;s loyal users away. It has, for some reasons became a part of their social life online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So agreed with you on the innovation and quality aspects. The innovation will kicks off the curiosity and sign-ups while the quality will help to create a stable and loyal user base.</p>
<p>However, Twitter defies the quality aspect. It&#8217;s not the most stable web services out there with many outages recently but that hasn&#8217;t turn many of it&#8217;s loyal users away. It has, for some reasons became a part of their social life online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

