<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Sick of Getting 1000+ Unread Articles a Day!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/07/21/1000-unread-articles-a-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/07/21/1000-unread-articles-a-day/</link>
	<description>All conjecture, minimal substance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/07/21/1000-unread-articles-a-day/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=91#comment-248</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Daryl&lt;/strong&gt; - Thanks, Daryl. Sometimes I wish that Google Reader had a function which allows you to MAAR everything except for the currently selected folder or feed.

(Of course, the obvious workaround is to categorize your non-&quot;must read&quot; feeds into a folder of its own so you can MAAR it at will, but somehow that just doesn&#039;t appeal to me as an elegant solution. Maybe I&#039;m just anal.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Daryl</strong> &#8211; Thanks, Daryl. Sometimes I wish that Google Reader had a function which allows you to MAAR everything except for the currently selected folder or feed.</p>
<p>(Of course, the obvious workaround is to categorize your non-&#8221;must read&#8221; feeds into a folder of its own so you can MAAR it at will, but somehow that just doesn&#8217;t appeal to me as an elegant solution. Maybe I&#8217;m just anal.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/07/21/1000-unread-articles-a-day/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=91#comment-247</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Daniel&lt;/strong&gt; - Yeah, 1000+ is really insane, and impossible to keep up with. Now that I&#039;ve removed all of my aggregator feeds, it&#039;s down to a much more manageable few hundred a day.

And your comment about Twitter is a good point. Usually, if the news is important enough and coming from people that are interesting enough for me to follow on Twitter, I will generally see it and read it from Twitter first, even before getting to Google Reader.

The beauty of social media is that there is more than one channel to get the word around. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Daniel</strong> &#8211; Yeah, 1000+ is really insane, and impossible to keep up with. Now that I&#8217;ve removed all of my aggregator feeds, it&#8217;s down to a much more manageable few hundred a day.</p>
<p>And your comment about Twitter is a good point. Usually, if the news is important enough and coming from people that are interesting enough for me to follow on Twitter, I will generally see it and read it from Twitter first, even before getting to Google Reader.</p>
<p>The beauty of social media is that there is more than one channel to get the word around. <img src='http://armchairtheorist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Tay</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/07/21/1000-unread-articles-a-day/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Tay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=91#comment-246</guid>
		<description>I follow #5 and #10 myself. Categorising by priority helps to focus what to read and which can be MAAR-ed. Good tips!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow #5 and #10 myself. Categorising by priority helps to focus what to read and which can be MAAR-ed. Good tips!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Richard &#124; WE</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/07/21/1000-unread-articles-a-day/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Richard &#124; WE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=91#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Woah. 1000+ unreads are surely a huge number. Though one thing I do is to keep my follows on Twitter. Meaning I read those articles that come to Twitter first. :)

Good to hear your strategy on combating the wealth of great content over on the web. Lol.

Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah. 1000+ unreads are surely a huge number. Though one thing I do is to keep my follows on Twitter. Meaning I read those articles that come to Twitter first. <img src='http://armchairtheorist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Good to hear your strategy on combating the wealth of great content over on the web. Lol.</p>
<p>Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

