<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ain&#8217;t Gonna Give up Firefox for Google Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/09/04/aint-gonna-give-up-firefox-for-google-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/09/04/aint-gonna-give-up-firefox-for-google-chrome/</link>
	<description>All conjecture, minimal substance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Tale of Three Blog Entries &#124; Armchair Theorist</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/09/04/aint-gonna-give-up-firefox-for-google-chrome/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>A Tale of Three Blog Entries &#124; Armchair Theorist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=360#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>After a day or two of downtime, I blogged again about Chrome, but this time on my experiences using Chrome once I had a chance to download it and play around with it for a bit. Again, I linked to the official Google blog, and I was able to top my previous record by registering 138 unique visiters on September 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a day or two of downtime, I blogged again about Chrome, but this time on my experiences using Chrome once I had a chance to download it and play around with it for a bit. Again, I linked to the official Google blog, and I was able to top my previous record by registering 138 unique visiters on September 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/09/04/aint-gonna-give-up-firefox-for-google-chrome/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=360#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Haha. Thanks, uzir, for you beautiful commentary. :)


I agree the forced automatic updates may be a bit problematic and could be a cause for worry. Will have to keep my eyes open to see how this develops.

Last thing I want is for Google to automatically push other products to me via Google update in the name of &quot;enhancing&quot; the Google Chrome product.

And +1 to your mention of megamaniacal control freak tendencies. My name is Jon, and I am also a control freak. Believe me, there are a lot more of us in geek land than we think! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. Thanks, uzir, for you beautiful commentary. <img src='http://armchairtheorist.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I agree the forced automatic updates may be a bit problematic and could be a cause for worry. Will have to keep my eyes open to see how this develops.</p>
<p>Last thing I want is for Google to automatically push other products to me via Google update in the name of &#8220;enhancing&#8221; the Google Chrome product.</p>
<p>And +1 to your mention of megamaniacal control freak tendencies. My name is Jon, and I am also a control freak. Believe me, there are a lot more of us in geek land than we think! <img src='http://armchairtheorist.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uzir</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/09/04/aint-gonna-give-up-firefox-for-google-chrome/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>uzir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=360#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Good article.  

I was intrigued by the buzz and wanted to take Chrome for a ride, but when the EULA popped up I noticed that there was no download link.  

There was an &#039;install&#039; link.

That made me pause a moment.  I&#039;m busy.  I dl all sorts of stuff on a whim, and think it over before I install it, and treasure such autonomy as I yet possess, so the inability to dl the .exe and run it at my convenience limits my ability to roll as I wish.  I don&#039;t like it, and I see this type of &#039;push&#039; sprouting up all over the net.

So I spent a few moments having a glance at the EULA - a bad habit, but one that springs from the same fear of lawyers and clowns I acquired as a child.  Two things in the EULA stick out in my mind, and in my craw.

The first is that Google claims the right to filter and censor &#039;content&#039;, which is the entirety of the net.  I&#039;m not down with that at all!

The second is that you must agree to automatic updates.  I&#039;m not down with that either.  There are very few programs I permit to autoupdate, and won&#039;t include anything from Google, Microsoft, Apple, or any other corporation bent on world domination.

I won&#039;t be taking Chrome for a spin.  Programs like Real, Quicktime, and any other such limiters of my megamaniacal control freak tendencies are prohibited from injection into my smoothly running box, where I control content, as well as operations.  Code which I decide to run may run.  Code which demands I cede control to evil website optimization marketers and tracking cookie vendors can stay the hell out of my box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  </p>
<p>I was intrigued by the buzz and wanted to take Chrome for a ride, but when the EULA popped up I noticed that there was no download link.  </p>
<p>There was an &#8216;install&#8217; link.</p>
<p>That made me pause a moment.  I&#8217;m busy.  I dl all sorts of stuff on a whim, and think it over before I install it, and treasure such autonomy as I yet possess, so the inability to dl the .exe and run it at my convenience limits my ability to roll as I wish.  I don&#8217;t like it, and I see this type of &#8216;push&#8217; sprouting up all over the net.</p>
<p>So I spent a few moments having a glance at the EULA &#8211; a bad habit, but one that springs from the same fear of lawyers and clowns I acquired as a child.  Two things in the EULA stick out in my mind, and in my craw.</p>
<p>The first is that Google claims the right to filter and censor &#8216;content&#8217;, which is the entirety of the net.  I&#8217;m not down with that at all!</p>
<p>The second is that you must agree to automatic updates.  I&#8217;m not down with that either.  There are very few programs I permit to autoupdate, and won&#8217;t include anything from Google, Microsoft, Apple, or any other corporation bent on world domination.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be taking Chrome for a spin.  Programs like Real, Quicktime, and any other such limiters of my megamaniacal control freak tendencies are prohibited from injection into my smoothly running box, where I control content, as well as operations.  Code which I decide to run may run.  Code which demands I cede control to evil website optimization marketers and tracking cookie vendors can stay the hell out of my box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/09/04/aint-gonna-give-up-firefox-for-google-chrome/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=360#comment-684</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the beauty of a rich add-on ecosystem. You have so many options and choices for extending the functionality of your web browser that everyone can have a slightly different - and more personalized - browsing experience.

Good news though - it does seem that extensions are next on the list for Google to implement for Chrome. When that happens, watch out...

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,1000000097,39484275,00.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the beauty of a rich add-on ecosystem. You have so many options and choices for extending the functionality of your web browser that everyone can have a slightly different &#8211; and more personalized &#8211; browsing experience.</p>
<p>Good news though &#8211; it does seem that extensions are next on the list for Google to implement for Chrome. When that happens, watch out&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,1000000097,39484275,00.htm" rel="nofollow">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,1000000097,39484275,00.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mullings</title>
		<link>http://armchairtheorist.com/2008/09/04/aint-gonna-give-up-firefox-for-google-chrome/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mullings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairtheorist.com/?p=360#comment-643</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention in the post.

I haven&#039;t spent enough time with Chrome yet to make a proper decision but I like it so far. Unfortunately, or fortunately, I mainly use a Mac so I will be happily using Firefox and Safari for the foreseeable future and checking in on Chrome at the office once in a while.

Your analysis is great (I don&#039;t even have any of those Firefox add-ons you mentioned).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention in the post.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t spent enough time with Chrome yet to make a proper decision but I like it so far. Unfortunately, or fortunately, I mainly use a Mac so I will be happily using Firefox and Safari for the foreseeable future and checking in on Chrome at the office once in a while.</p>
<p>Your analysis is great (I don&#8217;t even have any of those Firefox add-ons you mentioned).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
